WTF

You're now chatting with a random stranger. Say hi!

Official messages from Omegle will not be sent with the label 'Stranger:'. Strangers claiming to represent Omegle are lying.

Stranger: hi

You: Hey. :) How do you feel about abortion?

Stranger: pro-choice

You: Why?

Stranger: cuz i feel that if a woman wants to abort, then let her

You: Does that apply through all 9 months?

Stranger: i suppose

You: So if a woman wants to get an abortion and she's past her due date, she should be allowed?

Stranger: if she wants

You: What if she gives birth prematurely? Should she be allowed to kill the newborn?

Stranger: well thats not abortion, now is it?

You: What's the difference? Why does the exact same person have a right to live or not based solely on his or her location?

Stranger: im not saying its right or wrong, im saying technically its not called abortion naymore

Stranger: anymore*

You: Is it right to kill a born baby that was premature?

Stranger: personally, i dont think its either, and weather something's right or wrong is a label created by the individual based on their personal ethics

You: Should she be allowed to kill the premature born baby if she wants to?

Stranger: it wouldnt affect me at all so i dont see why not, but at the same time, it's rather cruel, so i dont see why she would

You: A teen mom a few months ago tried to kill her 4-month-old son to "make life easier".

You: Should she have been allowed to?

Stranger: as unfortunate that might look in the eyes of society, its is rational

You: What if the baby was four years old instead of four months?

Stranger: im talking rational in the sense of removing the child from her life, example through killing, but she aslo could have gave it away, or let her parents or someone she trusts care for it, as another example

Stranger: both examples being justified in that her life is now "easier"

You: Should she have been allowed to kill the baby?

Stranger: theoretically, yes

Stranger: although

Stranger: it would probably be in the best interest of all to go with the latter example

You: If the baby had been 4 years instead of 4 months, should she still have been allowed to kill him?

Stranger: again, yes, but like i just said it would probably be a better idea to let someone else care for it

You: What if he was 14?

Stranger: at that point hes old enough to partly care for himself, and also the mother would probably be both too emotionally attached to him, and could be able to care for him as well

You: Should she be allowed or not?

Stranger: idk why she would, but if she really wanted to

You: What if he wasn't her son, and just some random teen. Should she still be allowed to kill him?

Stranger: now its not even close to abortion where are we going with this

You: I just want to know when you get to have your life protected in the law, since you think she should be allowed to kill her 14-year-old son.

Stranger: well law is just a set of rules created by society to keep order, and by their definition, any form of killing afore

Stranger: afore mentioned here*

Stranger: outside of the womb is illegal

You: But should it be?

Stranger: well that is where you have the conflict between law and personal ethics

Stranger: so the answer is different for everyone

Stranger: to a degree

You: Should the law just let anyone do whatever they want?

Stranger: no, thats exactly what the law fights against, so ensure people just go do whatever they want.

Stranger: just dont go*

You: But you said that she should be allowed to kill her son

Stranger: by my ethics yes,
by law no

You: According to your ethics, when shouldn't she be allowed to kill him?

Stranger: when it becomes impractical to do so

Stranger: meaning

Stranger: when the child is no longer a burden to her

You: So she should be allowed to kill her son as long as he's a burden on her?

Stranger: basically untill she has no justification to do so

You: That's... kinda sick.

Stranger: like if he's 14, he's not going to bare her down, he can do things on his own, she has no need to kill him, but at the same time, as an infant, she is completely dependent on her

Stranger: not saying that 14 is the turning point, of course

Stranger: its a gradual turning point

You: You can't half-kill someone. She can either kill him or he can't.

Stranger: that isnt half killing, its either killing or it isnt, she kills him when he's an infant, or she never kills him

You: At what point can't she kill him?

Stranger: like i said its a gradual turning point

You: There can't be a gradual turning point for a yes or no question.

You: Either she can kill him or she can't. At some point, the answer switches from yes to no.

Stranger: so then tell me, at what exact age does an individual become able to for the most part, do things on their own? not legally, but physically capable of it?

Stranger: whats the exact age?

You: What doe you mean by that?

Stranger: like, take me for example, im 17, i can mostly do stuff without the help of my parents, i cant legally be on my own, but i can physically care for myself for the most part

Stranger: whats the exact age in which someone can do that?

You: It depends on the person.

Stranger: exatcly

Stranger: and thats why the turning point is gradual

You: It varies, but it's not gradual.

Stranger: but its not like one day you wake up with the ability to care for yourself like i described

Stranger: its something you gradually become able to do over time

You: You get better and better at it until the point when you can take care of yourself.

You: But I digress.

You: If the boy is handicapped and can't take care of himself even at 22, can she kill him?

Stranger: and wheres the exact point that someone becomes just a bit better and switches over to the "capable" side?

Stranger: there isnt a specific point

You: What part of "I digress" didn't you understand?

Stranger: oh i didnt see that sorry

Stranger: i was typing

You: That's okay.

You: If the boy is handicapped and can't take care of himself even at 22, can she kill him?

Stranger: theoretically yes, but why would she? at that point she would definitely be too emotionally attached to do so, and by then she would have acquired a job most likely, and just like any other functioning household she can care for him without it being a burden to her

You: That's... pretty disgusting.

You: Can you not see how sick that is?

Stranger: i see how one can view it as such

You: I...

You: No offense, but you're evil.

You have disconnected.

or send us feedback

Was this conversation great? Download the log!

the human form

You're now chatting with a random stranger. Say hi!

Official messages from Omegle will not be sent with the label 'Stranger:'. Strangers claiming to represent Omegle are lying.

Stranger: Ask a gay guy anything

You: How do you feel about the "gay gene" hypothesis?

Stranger: its an interesting hypothesis but

Stranger: i believe it is that coupled with hormones in the womb that determine your sexuality

Stranger: which is why its not black and white

You: Do you think we should look for the gene and/or hormones that cause homosexuality?

Stranger: idk

Stranger: probably

Stranger: just so we know where it is

Stranger: although

Stranger: it is said it is a mixture of certian genes

Stranger: not just one gene

You: What if people then started aborting babies that showed those genes/hormones?

Stranger: well it would be pretty hard to detect the hormones a they final rush of hormones is quite late in the pregnancy

Stranger: as*

You: Abortions can still be done late in pregnancy.

Stranger: true

Stranger: but in theory, they gay gene would go away i guess

Stranger: but

Stranger: there are some advantages to humanity , to 10% of the population being gay

You: I guess my question is would that be a bad thing, prenatally finding and killing gay people.

Stranger: well yeh

Stranger: think about it if they weren't in the womb

You: Hmm.

You: So how do you feel about abortion in general?

Stranger: im against it tbh, but

Stranger: i have no right to tell others what to do

You: You don't?

Stranger: so if they want one

You: Who told you that?

Stranger: up to them

You: So if I wanted to set fire to my neighbor's house, rape his cat, and kidnap his daughter, you'd have no right to tell me not to do that?

Stranger: well

Stranger: i guess i would try and stop you doing that

You: Why?

Stranger: i guess what i ment

Stranger: i have no right to tell others what to do with their own body*

You: True, I guess.

You: But the child is another body.

You: You can certainly tell someone what not to do to someone else's body.

Stranger: well its not a child, its still a foetus

You: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/child

child   
[chahyld] Show IPA
–noun, plural chil·dren.

4.
a human fetus.

You: But whatever, let's use the word fetus.

You: But the fetus is another body.

You: You can certainly tell someone what not to do to someone else's body.

Stranger: the foetus is not a body yet

Stranger: its just a group of cells

You: So are you.

Stranger: possibly with ought a brain

You: Bodies are made of cells.

Stranger: or any understanding of who/what it is

You: So in order to have a body, you need to be self-aware?

Stranger: no, you need to have developed most of the major organs

You: Well, that happens about 8 weeks from conception.

You: So are you saying you oppose abortion of fetuses, but not of embryos?

Stranger: tbh

Stranger: i dont know for sure

Stranger: ive heard both sides of the debate for this

Stranger: and i dont know who's right

You: And why do you need all the major organs to have a body?

You: Why can't you have a body that just happens to not have all the organs yet?

You: But okay, think of it this way.

You: You're saying you don't know if abortion kills a person, right?

Stranger: right

Stranger: well an embyryo

You: Well, what do we do in other such situations?

Stranger: as i have mixed up terms

You: Do we demolish up a building before we know if there are still people in it?

You: If a hunter sees a rustling in a bush, shouldn't he make sure it's a deer and not a fellow hunter before shooting?

Stranger: if its his bush

Stranger: wait no

Stranger: i misread that

You: If you're driving in a car, and see a humanoid shape coming at you, wouldn't you swerve, even if you didn't know if it was a scarecrow, a coat in the wind, or a human being?

You: In any other situation in which human life is at stake, we err on the side of life.

You: Why should abortion be the one exception?

Stranger: So if it has the potential to be human it should be allowed to live?

You: I didn't say that.

You: I said if we don't know if an entity is a person or not, we err on the side of caution.

You: If the embryo isn't a human yet, there's nothing wrong with abortion. But if the embryo is a human, it's immoral to kill said embryo.

Stranger: so if the mother doesn't want the baby we let it be born into a would were it will be unwanted?

You: Would you kill an infant to prevent her from growing up unwanted?

Stranger: that's diferent

You: Why?\

You: It's the same person, just older.

You: Do we become more human as we grow up? Biology tells us an organism can't change species.

Stranger: well

Stranger: when we are a embryo

Stranger: we dont have the human form yet

You: What is "the human form"?

You: We have the form of a human at that age.

You: Humans have different forms at different stages of development.

Stranger: em·bry·o (ĕmˈbrē-ōˌ)
noun pl. embryos em·bry·os
a. An organism in its early stages of development, especially before it has reached a distinctively recognizable form.

You: Recognizable, yes.

You: But notice the word "organism".

You: An organism can't be part of another organism.

You: The embryo is a separate body from the mother, so your "i have no right to tell others what to do with their own body" doesn't apply.

Stranger: well its going to be affecting the mother's body for most of a year

You: Also, "before it has reached a distinctively recognizable form" doesn't mean the embryo isn't human.

You: It just means that the human form at that stage is similar to many other forms.

Stranger: so i think it does

You: So now you can do whatever you want with anything that affects your body? That's a much broader claim than your original one.

Stranger: i dont know tbh

You: And again, what do we do when we don't know if an action could kill someone?

You: We don't do it.

Stranger: which is why if it were up to me, I wouldnt have one

Stranger: all this stemmed from

Stranger: What if people then started aborting babies that showed those (gay) genes/hormones?

You: Yeah, interesting how conversations evolve.

You: So what, in your view, grants a person the right to not be killed, and to have that right protected by law?

Stranger: well

Stranger: i dont think you should kill a fetus

You: Why not?

Stranger: its got significantly more features of a human than an Embryo does

You: What do you mean by "features of a human"? And what about these grant rights?

You: Are you saying just looking human is enough to have rights, and humans that don't "look" human by whatever arbitrary and subjective aesthetic criteria can be killed by the millions?

You: Wouldn't it be more fair and logical just to grant all humans human rights, regardless of their physical appearance?

Stranger: what about the right's of the mother?

You: If the fetus is a person, she has no more right to kill him or her before birth than after birth.

Stranger: i would agree with you there

Stranger: i dont think an embryo is though

You: Why not?

You: Because the embryo doesn't "look" human, based on some arbitrary and subjective aesthetic criteria you decided make someone disposable?

Your conversational partner has disconnected.

or send us feedback

Was this conversation great? Download the log!

Question Dodging

Stranger: what do you think about him then

You: hes a jerk

Stranger: why

You: he hates babies

Stranger: what?

You: hes a jerk

Stranger: how does he hate babies

You: he voted for infanticide

Stranger: abortion?

You: no infanticide

You: there was a bill to make it illegal to kill babies born alive after a failed abortion and he voted against it

Stranger: so it would be better that babies would be born with disformation?

You: huh?

You: Are you saying disabled ppl should be murdered?

You: wtf!

Stranger: aborted before they are boen

You: this bill was making it illegal to kill BORN babies

Stranger: do you have name of the bill

You: Born Alive Infants Protection Act

Stranger: why there are failed abortions

You: huh?

You: what do u mean?

You: hello?

Stranger: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ207/html/PLAW-107publ207.htm

Stranger: that?

You: i guess

Stranger: "regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion."

You: is that the federal one?

Stranger: I am not the american here but it says "107th Congress Public Law 207" so I would guess it is

You: he voted against the illinois one

You: why did you quote that section?

Stranger: you have failed abortion and the baby dont have any limbs

Stranger: doesnt sound very humane to me

You: so people without any limbs should be murdered?

Stranger: no you get your human rights when you are certain age

You: what age is that?

Stranger: lets say 6 months

You: after birth?

Stranger: after conception

You: what if the abortion was at 6 months and the baby had no limbs?

Stranger: err you dont abort after 6 months

You: says who?

You: it happens, just not much

Stranger: havent thought that much about exactly when fetus should get human rights

You: so a healthy baby born at 5 months has no rights?

You: according to mr. Stranger: I think we should be less ageist

Stranger: I think it is good that there is possibility for abortion

Stranger: as if parents dont have means to raise child

You: what if they do at first but dont l8r?

Stranger: it would we better than child wont have to suffer from inability of parents

You: if a family goes broke can they kill their toddler?

You: to save her from suffering?

Stranger: no

You: why not?

You: she'll suffer from their inability

You: why isn't it better for her to die?

You: she's the same girl she was in the womb, just older

You: if we're not gonna be ageist, it's good to kill her too

Stranger: I didnt mean we should treat everyone completely the same way irregardless of age but that we shouldnt stereotype individuals

Stranger: based on their age

You: i think killing someone is a bit worse than stereotyping htem

You: them

Stranger: ?

You: so is it only racist to stereotype blacks, but not to deny them equal rights?

Stranger: so you think that you get your human rights nanosecond after conception

You: i think u get them as soon as u exist

Stranger: then sperm should have rights

Stranger: and masturbation would be murder

You: what?

You: what r u talking about?

Stranger: there is continuity from sperm to baby

You: no, when the sperm and egg meet a new organism is formed

You: jesus christ this is 7th grade biology!

Stranger: I said " so you think that you get your human rights nanosecond after conception "

Stranger: then why didnt you say yes then

You: well not after

You: somewhere in conception

Stranger: what is the difference

You: conception takes like 12-24 hours to finish

You: its a process not an moment

You: the sperm goes into the egg then the genes have to mix

You: i dont think it makes sense to say someone's too young for human rights

You: you get human rights just 4 being human

Stranger: http://docinthemachine.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/embryo-brochure.jpg

Stranger: is what we are talking about now

You: whats your point?

Stranger: does 4 cells constitute a human

You: those do

You: and that looks more like 7

Stranger: cant be

Stranger: odd number

You: maybe 8

You: why does being an odd number matter?

You: yeah i see 8

Stranger: so can you murder baby you arent aware that exists

You: no u cant

You: murder needs intent

You: u cant murder an adult u dont know exists either

Stranger: bad translation

Stranger: manslaughter

You: hmm

You: ianal

Stranger: what?

You: i am not a lawyer

You: idk how manslaughter law works

You: or what's so funny about it

Stranger: ?

You: manslaughter = man's laughter

You: its a pun

Stranger: sexists!

You: what?

Stranger: nothing

Stranger: what do you think about gay marriage

You: i say the govt should stay out of marriage

Stranger: I didnt ask that

You: im cool with it

Stranger: who do you opposite abortion

Stranger: *why

You: cause its wrong

Stranger: why is it wrong

You: i thought we'd moved to marriage

Stranger: it was too boring

You: oh ok

You: its wrong because it kills people

Stranger: do you have problem with killing mosquitos

You: mosquitos arent people

Stranger: why people are special

Stranger: should gorilla that can communicate using sign language have same rights as human

You: ?

Stranger: "Koko has a vocabulary of over 1000 signs (American Sign Language) most of which she learned during the first few years of the project. However, she continues to learn (and occasionally invent) new signs, to improve her ability to communicate with her caregivers"

Stranger: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U64k_fA2Rcc

You: oh

You: So what?

Stranger: there is nothing special about human

You: so you're saying using sign language gives your rights?

Stranger: I am not saying I am asking

You: no it doesnt

Stranger: even if it has better understanding of world than a child

You: so?

Stranger: human child

You: since when does understanding give rights?

Stranger: understanding is what supposedly makes humans special

Stranger: they dont have same rights because arent same species?

You: so you're saying a gorilla has rights but a human newborn doesnt?

Stranger: I didnt say that

You: so why bring up understanding?

Stranger: mosquitos arent people

Stranger: "mosquitos arent people"

You: do you think they are?

Stranger: so we can kill anyone who isnt a homo sapiens sapiens

You: if you're not human are you "someone"?

Stranger: only humans have personhood and identity?

You: what do YOU think gives rights?

Stranger: capabilities

You: what capabilities?

You: and since when are rights based on what you can do?

Stranger: 6 year old doesnt get to vote

Stranger: should we let 6 year olds vote

You: yes we should

Stranger: why

You: why not?

Stranger: "why not?" doesnt answer to question "why"

You: it does too

Stranger: I was asking your opinion not asking you to ask my opinion

You: because they're affected by govt too

Stranger: gorillas are affected by govt too

Stranger: they never get to vote

You: they're citizens

Stranger: should 6 year old bare same responsibilities as 18 year old

You: depends on the 6 year old

You: in your opinion what do i have to do to earn the right to not be murdered?

Stranger: responsibilities depend but voting doesnt?

Stranger: you get influence without responsibilities?

You: i wouldnt trust a test to say who can vote

Stranger: there was a test for blacks in america

Stranger: that way south kept them from not voting

You: yes, and look how that turned out

Stranger: that is why they are certain age when people are generally expected to be

Stranger: that there cant be discrimination on test

You: ive seen some morons that still get to vote

Stranger: yes

Stranger: but again if you make test

Stranger: you are giving someone power to decide whether s/he can vote

You: thats my point

Stranger: why should you get citizenship through birth

Stranger: isnt that discrimination

Stranger: global caste system

You: huh?

Stranger: your citizenship restricts your mobility

Stranger: in same way as castes used to

You: in your opinion what do i have to do to earn the right to not be murdered?

Stranger: born

You: you said at 6 months after conception

You: which is it?

Stranger: I dont see that much difference

You: um, birth is 9 months

Stranger: yes?

You: there's a 3 month difference

Stranger: which isnt much

Stranger: you would expect

Stranger: that by the time mother has become aware

Stranger: and made her decision

You: do you get your rights at 6 months or 9 months?

Stranger: I said it doesnt make much difference

Stranger: is it 6 7 8 or 9

You: which is it? 3 months is a quarter of a year

Stranger: as it doesnt make much difference whether voting age is 17 18 19

You: is it okay to have an abortion at 7 months?

Stranger: depends on legistation

You: morally

You: its legal in all 9 months

Stranger: not in every country

You: in some countries its illegal in all 9 months

Stranger: true

You: im asking your opinion, not the law's

Stranger: I already said I dont see much difference where you but the time when you get your human rights

Stranger: as long as there is enough time that parents get to consider

Stranger: if you have missed two ovaries you rings should start rining

Stranger: ringing

You: theres a show called I didnt know i was pregnant

Stranger: yes

You: what do you mean ringing?

Stranger: I said should

You: what do yo mean about ringing ovaries/

You: how can ovaries ring?

Stranger: you have missed two periods

Stranger: you should start suspecting something

Stranger: of course it is possible because of malnutrion also

You: or cysts

You: theres a show called I didnt know i was pregnant where they dont know until they give birth

Stranger: I dont know about that

You: its on TLC

Stranger: I dont live in america and I watch tv less than 5 minutes per week on average

You: well its there

You: is it 6 or 9?

Stranger: already told you

You: no you didnt

Stranger: I said it doesnt make much difference

Stranger: couple of times

You: and i told u it does

Stranger: you asked my opinion

You: and you didnt tell me it

Stranger: all ready told you many times

You: is it moral to kill a 7 month baby?

Stranger: and I said dont see much difference where you but the time when you get human rights

You: the difference is you can or cannot kill the baby

Stranger: yes

You: so which is it?

Stranger: .......................

Stranger: .........................

Stranger: ....................

Stranger: ........................

Stranger: ..........................

Stranger: ..................

Stranger: ........................

Stranger: how many times do i have to answer

You: only once

Stranger: I did 5 times

You: you havent yet

You: you keep dodging the question

Stranger: I havent dodged

Stranger: I said it doesnt make difference to me

Stranger: is it 6

Stranger: 7

Stranger: 8

Stranger: or 9

You: is it moral to kill a 7-month baby, yes or no?

Stranger: you pick a number from 6 to 9

Stranger: you dont get to abort after

You: YES OR NO?

Stranger: what part you dont understand

You: the part where you don't answer me

You: you can say you dont know

Stranger: already answered many times

Stranger: I dont see difference which number you pick

You: i told you difference

You: the difference is life or death for the baby

Stranger: zzzzzzzzzzz

You: okay whatever what's so special about birth that it means you can't kill the baby?

Stranger: what?

You: you said the baby gets rights at birth

You: why?

Stranger: or at 6 or 7 or 8 or 9

You: so at birth the child already has rights

Stranger: if its less than 9 then yes

You: why can a 5-month baby be killed but not a 10-month child?

Stranger: so that every child is wanted

You: can an unwanted toddler be killed?

Stranger: or maxium number of childs are wanted

You: can an unwanted toddler be killed?

Stranger: i have already told you have i think

Stranger: there is a period after conception

Stranger: when parents get to judge whether they have means to raise child

Stranger: if they come to conclusion that they dont

Stranger: they have abortion

Stranger: after period has expired

Stranger: they dont get to abort

You: what's so special about that period?

Stranger: it is intended to make maximum number of babies wanted

You: if they find out late or the situation changes, why can't they abort at 9 months?

Stranger: and make wellbeing of children better

You: if they change their mind, why can't they kill an unwanted newborn?

Stranger: because child has to get his human rights sometime

You: why doesn't the child have human rights at 5 months?

Stranger: so that maximum number of children are wanted

Stranger: and raised by parents that have the means to do it

You: why does the child have human rights at 10 months?

Stranger: because child has to get his human rights sometime

You: why can't that time be at puberty?

Stranger: that child is lawless until puberty?

You: why not?

You: why can't the time be at age 2?

You: why can't the age be 4 months?

Stranger: because its outside body

You: so a baby born at 5 months can't be killed?

You: because its outside the body

You: even though its before 6 months

Stranger: here its legal up to 6 months because of fetal defects , socioeconomic factors and rape

Stranger: up to 9 months to protect mothers life , physical health and mental health

You: does a 5 month born baby have rights?

You: a baby born 4 months early

You: does it have human rights?

Stranger: i would need better medical knowledge

Stranger: on the changes of survival

Stranger: probability of defections

You: it's healthy

Stranger: I would still need

Stranger: you dont make laws based on whether individual is healthy

You: i thought you said you get human rights at birth

Stranger: never said that

You: You: in your opinion what do i have to do to earn the right to not be murdered?
Stranger: born

You: if you dont make laws based on whether individual is healthy, why does it matter if they will have defects?

Stranger: Stranger: you said at 6 months after conception
Stranger: which is it?
You: I dont see that much difference

You: so its 6 months

Stranger: netherlands have exactly 6 months in every case if I am reading correctly

Stranger: cuba its 3 months

You: USA has until birth, and ireland has 0 months

Stranger: ireland has de facto until birth

Stranger: you can always travel across bond to uk

You: dominican republic has 0

You: chile

You: nicaragua

You: el salvador

You: several us states before 1973

Stranger: yes?

Stranger: there is a pattern

Stranger: many of those are catholic

You: so?

Stranger: their laws are based on laws supposedly giving by sky daddy

You: whats your point?

Stranger: just a comment

You: so why can't people get human rights after birth, or before 6 months?

Stranger: you are asking same questions again and again

Stranger: and would only give same answers again and again

You: i havent asked this one

You: iirc

Stranger: what

You: why 6-9 months and not 2 months or 2 years?

Stranger: 2 months isnt enough

You: isnt enough for what?

Stranger: to know with high probability that you are pregnant and make informed decision based on that

Stranger: and isnt enough to see if child is mentally deficit

You: if you don't find out the child is disabled until she's three years old, why can't you kill her?

Stranger: I already told you

Stranger: child has to get its human rights at some point

You: why can't she get human rights at four?

Stranger: somewhere between 6 and 9 is reasonable in my opinion

Stranger: months

You: why can't she get human rights at four years?

You: why can't she get human rights at 12 months?

Stranger: because there has been enough time to make decisision in many cases

You: what if there wasn't?

You: what if they only just found out?

Stranger: you make laws for all

Stranger: you make laws for general cases

You: so in your view human rights aren't real, but just legal fictions?

Stranger: if you mean somehow divine

Stranger: then no

You: Are they inherent, or do we just have them if someone else says we have them?

Stranger: human rights are construct of human mind

You: if someone decided you didn't have rights, would you lose yours?

Stranger: do you know what is utilitarianism

Stranger: and it is very closely related to what we are talking

Stranger: not trying to dodge

Stranger: yes?

Stranger: no?

You: yes i do and i dont like it

You: this one guy said babies arent people until a year after birth

Stranger: that is the way I approach it

Stranger: what one guy

You: peter singer

Stranger: you know background to that

You: huh?

Stranger: is lying always wrong

You: no

Stranger: is killing always wrong

You: no

You: if we get rights at birth, Obama's vote was wrong

Stranger: I dont know background to that

You: to what?

Stranger: do you have the full illinois law

You: lemme look

You: why can't we give parents a longer time than 9 months to decide if they can handle a baby?

You: what would be wrong with making the age 12 or 18 months instead of 6 or 9/

You: ?

Stranger: i dont work in your absolutist world

You: should it be legal to kill a newborn if you decide you can't care for her/

Stranger: I don't see problems with the current system

You: it lets babies be killed!

Stranger: embryos

You: it doesnt minimize unwanted children

Stranger: yes it does

You: no it doesnt

You: if a born child is unwanted, they cant be killed

You: therefore it doesnt

You: it reduces, but it does not minimize

Stranger: synonyms

You: no they're not

You: minimize means to bring to a minimum

You: the minimum is the smallest possible amount

You: they're no more synonyms than less and least are synonyms

Stranger: Definition of MINIMIZE "to reduce"

Stranger: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/minimize

You: min·i·mize: Reduce (something, esp. something unwanted or unpleasant) to the smallest possible amount or degree

You: http://www.google.com/dictionary?source=dict-chrome-ex&sl=en&tl=en&q=minimize

Stranger: yes words have many meanings english is peace of shit

Stranger: piece

You: full definition you quoted: : to reduce or keep to a minimum

Stranger: OR

You: yes

Stranger: or means either is valid

You: to reduce or keep, to a minimum

Stranger: or both

Stranger: there is no comma

You: means either "reduce to a minimum" or "keep to a minimum" is valid

Stranger: THERE IS NO COMMA

Stranger: 1
: to reduce or keep to a minimum

Stranger: without comma

You: same deal without the comma

Stranger: you are pulling that comma from your ass

Stranger: liar

You: min·i·mize (mn-mz)
tr.v. min·i·mized, min·i·miz·ing, min·i·miz·es
1.
a. To reduce to the smallest possible amount, extent, size, or degree.

You: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/minimize

Stranger: yes???

You: min·i·mize
   /ˈmɪnəˌmaɪz/ Show Spelled[min-uh-mahyz] Show IPA
–verb (used with object), -mized, -miz·ing.
1.
to reduce to the smallest possible amount or degree.

You: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/minimize

Stranger: : to reduce or keep to a minimum

Stranger: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/minimize

Stranger: english is a language without central authority

You: even your definition agrees with me!

Stranger: to reduce or keep to a minimum

Stranger: without comma

You: i know

Stranger: or means

You: the comma was unnecessary

Stranger: either or both of them may be true

You: correct

Stranger: so to reduce

You: either "reduce to a minimum" or "keep to a minimum" is valid

Stranger: is correct usage

Stranger: zzzzzzz

Stranger: to reduce or keep to a minimum

Stranger: why the fuck are you arguing about this

You: if you say "i chewed and swallowed my food", both verbs are to the end of the sentence

Stranger: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/OR.html

Stranger: there is you how or works

You: "you can lick or bite a tootsie pop"

You: "you can walk or run to the store"

Stranger: english is ambigious language

You: since the definition you cite is ambiguous, we should look to other dictionaries for clearer definitions

Stranger: *ambiguous

Stranger: whole language is ambigious

Stranger: it has no central authority

You: http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/minimize

Stranger: if you want ass to mean table

You: min·i·mize audio (mn-mz) KEY

TRANSITIVE VERB:
min·i··mized, min·i··miz·ing, min·i··miz·es

1.
1. To reduce to the smallest possible amount, extent, size, or degree.

Stranger: you only need to gather following for it

You: to reduce something harmful or unpleasant to the smallest amount or degree

We must minimize the damage to innocent civilians.

http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/minimize

Stranger: "to reduce something harmful "

You: –verb-transitive
# To reduce to the smallest possible amount, extent, size, or degree.

http://www.wordnik.com/words/Minimize

You: "to the smallest amount or degree"

Stranger: and?

You: minimize verb
(UK usually minimise) Click to hear the UK pronunciation of this wordClick to hear the US pronunciation of this word/ˈmɪn.ɪ.maɪz/ v [T]
Share this
Definition
•
to reduce something to the least possible level or amount
We must minimize the risk of infection.
Environmentalists are doing everything within their power to minimize the impact of the oil spill.
Opposite: maximize

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/minimize

Stranger: english is piece of shit

Stranger: I already know it

You: Verb

to minimize (third-person singular simple present minimizes, present participle minimizing, simple past and past participle minimized)

1. (transitive) To make (something) as small or as insignificant as possible.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/minimize

i think ive made my point

Stranger: argumentum ad potentiam

You: but lets go with reduce

Stranger: argumentum ad populum

Stranger: argumentum ad potentiam

Stranger: argumentum ad populum

Stranger: argumentum ad populum

Stranger: argumentum ad populum

Stranger: argumentum ad populum

Stranger: argumentum ad populum

Stranger: argumentum ad populum

You: you did say that all it needs is a big enough following

Stranger: argumentum ad populum

Stranger: yes

You: thats a pretty big following

Stranger: but no universal

Stranger: therefore its ambiguous

You: im pretty sure you're the only one who disagrees

Stranger: what?

You: whatever. let's go with reduce.

Stranger: fuck off

You: getting human rights would also reduce unwanted children

You: rights at 4 months*

Stranger: countries with highest child well being

Stranger: are all abortion countries

You: so we should kill unhappy children?

Stranger: zzzzzzzzzzz

Stranger: strawman much

You: we could up those numbers even further if we allowed infanticide

Stranger: would you stop strawmans

You: im not

Stranger: would you stop repeating everything fucking hundred times

You: this is your logic

Stranger: Stranger: so we should kill unhappy children?

Stranger: is a strawman

Stranger: i didnt say that any point

You: by your logic, you're better off dead than sad.

Stranger: either you stop misrepreseting

Stranger: or fuck off

Stranger: your way of constructing strawmans are reapeating everything

Stranger: is fucking annoying

You: ok so tell me why it's okay to kill a 5-month-old but not a 5-year-old

Your conversational partner has disconnected.

or send us feedback

Was this conversation great? Download the log!